Example of an outline for a research paper: Compare your work to the previous studies to make sure there are no. Do you find it tricky? Only a research paper example offers an illustrative view of the above points of consideration. Writing professionally reaching out to a client or prospect. Discussion section of a research paper. For example, you may not have well defined research for example, asking all you colleagues in the office what is their opinion about a particular product or service.
Academic Writing Tips for the Discussion Section of a Research Paper
How to Write a Discussion for an APA Style Paper | Synonym
This article is part of an ongoing series on academic writing help of scholarly articles. Previous parts explored how to write an introduction for a research paper , literature review outline and format , and how to write a research methodology. Academics and researchers publish their scholarly articles to show the results they have obtained using gathered or collected data. Research papers present the process of testing hypotheses or models and how their findings help shape or advance a particular research topic. The findings of your research should be included in a separate section of your academic article, as it is the only section that contains data and results.
Academic Phrases for Writing Results & Discussion Sections of a Research Paper
The discussion chapter is where you delve into the meaning, importance and relevance of your results. It should focus on explaining and evaluating what you found, showing how it relates to your literature review and research questions, and making an argument in support of your overall conclusion. DiscussionDont repeat results. Order simple to complex building to conclusion ; or may state conclusion first.
The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction. So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's knowledge has been changed by the addition of this new data. While the introduction starts generally and narrows down to the specific hypothesis, the discussion starts with the interpretation of the results, then moves outwards to contextualize these findings in the general field. The Discussion section is sort of an odd beast because it is here where you speculate, but must avoid rambling, guessing, or making logical leaps beyond what is reasonably supported for your data.