This article is part of an ongoing series on academic writing help of scholarly articles. Previous parts explored how to write an introduction for a research paper , literature review outline and format , how to write a research methodology , and presenting research findings. Also, it is important to point out and clarify any new understanding or contributions your study brings to the problem you have examined. This section is frequently viewed as the most important component of your academic article.
Academic Writing Tips for the Discussion Section of a Research Paper
Academic Writing Tips for the Discussion Section of a Research Paper - Expert Journals
The next big step is writing a scientific discussion. It is the last part of your paper, in which you summarize your findings in light of the current literature. You also need to zero in on how your work will move the field forward and what questions remain. Unlike the abstract , the discussion does not have a broad readership per se, but is written for both beginners to that particular area of science and experts of the same. So, what do you need to do to make the scientific discussion section a success?
Results & Discussion
The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction. So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's knowledge has been changed by the addition of this new data. While the introduction starts generally and narrows down to the specific hypothesis, the discussion starts with the interpretation of the results, then moves outwards to contextualize these findings in the general field.
Writing the Discussion Section printable version here. The Discussion should be written after the Results section so that you have a good idea of what the experiment has demonstrated. The discussion section should definitely have a statement of your expected findings Pechenik, This should include your hypothesis and a brief statement about why these types of results are expected. There should also be a comparison of how your actual results related to your expected findings Pechenik,